Saturday, December 28, 2013

NESCOE on Northern Pass

The New England States Committee on Electricity (NESCOE) advises the New England Governors on energy policies. On September 9, 2013, NESCOE published a whitepaper on Canadian hydropower imports.*


Incremental Hydro Power Imports Whitepaper (Fall 2013)
 
Excerpt on Northern Pass

New Hampshire public officials note that the Northern Pass proposal faces significant hurdles to  its implementation in its current form. Organized grass-roots opposition by citizens, advocacy groups and state and local elected officials, has led to apparent bipartisan opposition to the project in the New Hampshire Legislature. As of August 2013, proposed bills designed to modify the features of (or prevent the building of) Northern Pass have been introduced in the New Hampshire Legislature. If these efforts are not successful, litigation against the project is likely to follow. Objections against the project center around the potential visual impact of transmission towers on scenic areas of northern New Hampshire, the associated impacts on property values and tourism in the communities along the proposed route, and the belief that the power provided is not needed by New Hampshire, and would be sent to southern New England. (p. 32 n51)
_______________________
*The link to this study is posted on NESCOE's home page.

Friday, December 27, 2013

"Northern Pass: No Exchange, No Returns"


Guest commentary by Nancy Martland, Sugar Hill, published by the Laconia Citizen, 12/27/2013, and republished here with permission.
 
 
 
Northern Pass: No Exchange, No Returns
By Nancy Martland
 
It’s happened to all of us.  You’re given a beautiful package wrapped in shiny paper with pretty ribbons that you just can’t wait to open. Inside you find a tangerine and purple sweater with a lime green teddy bear appliqué in a size you haven’t worn for at least 20 years.  After a moment of stunned silence, you automatically thank the giver -- it’s the thought that counts, right? Yet, all the good intentions in the world cannot change the fact that this gift is not right for you.
 
It is for this reason that the customer service window was invented by stores that value customer satisfaction and loyalty.  There you can exchange that tangerine job for a nice black wool crew neck that fits and you feel comfortable wearing.
 
About three years ago, New Hampshire received a package from Northeast Utilities, called the Northern Pass.  It was wrapped in pretty paper, and presented to us with a flourish as the best deal we were ever going to see.  Once we had it open though, we realized that it didn’t fit, and we didn’t much like it. The shiny wrappings covered unappealing features that made us decide we had to return the package.
 
Only Northern Pass didn’t have a customer service window. They insisted that we keep it whether we liked it or not.  It seemed Northern Pass has a “no returns, no exchange” policy, and New Hampshire is pretty much stuck with whatever white elephant “gift” they want to give us.
 
What was concealed beneath that shiny paper?
 
Massive towers through 187 miles of New Hampshire’s signature landscape, our mountains and valleys, our towns and neighborhoods. And just to be clear, we are not talking about a few telephone poles. We are talking about more than 1500 metal lattice towers. With a 30 X 30’ footprint including poured concrete footings, they range from 90 to 135+ feet in height, reaching far above our tallest trees to dominate the landscape. Northern Pass reassuringly told us we would “get used to” these monsters.  Kind of like the returns clerk telling you, “Oh, we can’t exchange that. You’ll get used to that lime green teddy on your tangerine and orange sweater.”
 
In the end, we simply couldn’t keep the package.  We found out about an alternative.  We learned that technology exists to place the lines underground.  NP’s partner, Hydro-Quebec, markets this technology as a cost-efficient low-impact alternative to overhead lines.  Yet, Northern Pass insists that burying is too expensive and too impractical. Many disagree with them on this point.
 
Contrary to Northern Pass claims, this technology,  HVDC Light, is practical and reasonably priced.  Other energy developers understand this and realize that the public does not object to invisible, secure buried transmission lines.  Projects transmitting Canadian power south through Vermont, New York, Pennsylvania and Maine will use this technology, and are facing little if any public outcry as they navigate the permitting process.  These projects use already softened corridors, such as highways or railroad beds; some lines go underwater.  Often there is payment to the state which owns such corridors. In addition to their low impact, underground lines are far less susceptible to weather damage, have fewer faults, and when sited along highways they are easier to get to than aerial lines strung through remote areas.  Odds are that these forward-looking underground projects will be in full service while Northern Pass is still tangled in permitting and legal battles that will likely prevent the project from ever being built in its present design.
 
Curiously, Northern Pass remains unmoved by the sustained objection to this project – not just from individuals whose land is directly affected, but from whole towns that voted to oppose it, 33 of them.  They took no notice when Governor Maggie Hassan and Senator Kelly Ayotte told them they ought to put it underground. They did not heed objections from every North Country Chamber of Commerce or all of New Hampshire’s environmental groups. With breathtaking arrogance and utter lack of regard for our iconic landscape and the project’s crippling damage to everyday people, Northern Pass simply plows on, running expensive ads that highlight the shiny paper and pretty ribbons, paying high-priced lobbyists to influence legislators, and acting as if the objections didn’t exist.
 
If Northern Pass ever expects to run even one foot of high voltage cable through our state, they will need a customer service window, equipped with 187 miles of HVDC Light underground cable for New Hampshire customers who demand to exchange this unwanted gift for a solution that respects our state and its citizens.
 

Thursday, November 7, 2013

Some Recent Scoping Comments on Northern Pass's Amended Presidential Permit Application, Sept.- Nov. 2013


 

Click on the name of the group to see the full text.


Concerns include underground and other alternatives; purpose and need; greenhouse gas emissions and environmental impacts of power sources; visual impacts; impacts on conservation land and WMNF; procedural fairness and impartiality.


" . . . the wild brook trout prevalent in most all northern New Hampshire tributary streams  . . . stand to be adversely affected during project construction."


"We feel the disturbance from this project, as proposed, threatens the values and characteristics for which the river was designated."


Concerns include procedural fairness and impartiality; purpose and need defined too narrowly to the unfair benefit of applicant; lack of alternative routes, sites, designs and analysis of their impacts. Calls for comprehensive analysis of impacts of generation and transmission in Canada and environmental (including visual) impacts in U.S. AMC renews its request for post-scoping pre-draft EIS to be circulated.

Determine whether Northern Pass as an optional private project meets "overriding public need" standard required to cross the Appalachian Trail in the WMNF.


Concerns include negative visual, environmental, and economic impacts; property values.


Application deficiencies include confusing presentation of data; insufficient data; potential visual impacts under reported; unknown impacts on drinking water.

Connecticut River Watershed Council  (9/26/2013)

Shortcomings of National Wetland Inventory require applicant to collect on the ground data and make it available to the public. The project must meet highest environmental standards during construction and ongoing maintenance. 

Conservation Law Foundation  (11/5/2013)

Alternatives, including non-transmission, burial, and routes in other states, must be considered. More rigorous analysis of GHG emissions of hydro dams is necessary.Mistaken approaches used for EIS of Champlain Hudson project must not be repeated for Northern Pass. Assess environmental impacts in Canada in light of Northern Pass's claims. Ongoing procedural deficiencies and renewed call for changes in DOE NEPA process. 


The town and BOS "formally oppose the Northern Pass project as proposed." The BOS also officially  opposes any new development of AC or DC overhead high voltage transmission lines within its borders.

(Town of) Easton NH Conservation Commission  (11/4/2013)

Recommendation to Forest Supervisor Wagner: remove existing PSNH line from the WMNF and bury it with Northern Pass line along I-93. 

Environmental Protection Agency (10/24/2013)

"The EIS should . . . examine whether there are reasonable opportunities for additional transmission line burial . . ."


Hydro Quebec power is not "green"; habitat fragmentation; vegetative understory changes. 

(Town of) Holderness NH Select Board (9/24/2013)

"The project is all cost and few if any savings."



"We are concerned that the project will increase the risk of loon power line collisions. Loons are particularly vulnerable to these collisions because they are large, heavy-bodied birds and maneuver poorly in flight.. . [L]oons, with vision adapted for underwater foraging, may have trouble seeing and avoiding power lines. In fact, in 2008, New Hampshire Fish and Game staff recovered a banded loon after it collided with a power line in Stewartstown, causing a local power outage."


Concerns: "potential physical, visual, and audible impacts" on the AT.


"The National Trust is deeply concerned about the potential adverse effects of this massive . . . project on the historic and cultural resources of New Hampshire." Procedural irregularities.


Northern Pass misrepresents the likely energy market and environmental impact of the project (CO2 reduction; reduction of dependence on natural gas use) and the project's role in addressing New England's reliability concerns. Northern Pass fails to discuss reliability threats posed by its project. Northern Pass misrepresents its ability to gain site control over its proposed route and the likely employment prospects of its project.

New Hampshire Audubon (9/23/2013)

"Given the high concentration of migrating passerines, the overlap of flight elevations with proposed tower heights, and the location of this area within the White Mountain National Forest, we strongly urge that the Northern Pass EIS include studies of migration patterns over the proposed corridor at key locations, designed in consultation with experienced migration specialists. Potential locations might include the western slope of Kinsman Mountain and the Pemigewasset River valley, where migration tracks and the proposed route are likely to intersect, and possibly the Bog Pond basin, where extensive wetlands may provide an important stopover area in this mountainous landscape."


"Our request [to be joined as an interested stakeholder] has never been acknowledged." Desktop GIS data not an adequate method to locate resources.


Comprehensive inventory of historic resources needed; setting and surrounding landscapes must be considered; consider all alternatives, including burial and no build; consider economic impacts on tourism.

 Peabody Smith Realty Inc (9/20/2013)
Attachment  (9/16/2013)

The Northern Pass project has already had a chilling effect on hundreds if not thousands of properties and is putting homeowners in a perilous position if they must sell.

Peter W. Powell Real Estate (11/4/2013)

Industry studies showing no property devaluation from power lines do not replicate conditions in New Hampshire. 


"Nothing could be more foreign to our community and to our way of life" than Northern Pass.


" . . . the U. S. Forest Service must refrain from allowing any special exemptions from the generally applicable laws to allow Northern Pass to proceed"  across the WMNF.


RESTORE strongly opposes Northern Pass because 1) Hydro Quebec dams damage habitat and drive out native people; 2) Northern Pass would cut through and fragment two roadless areas, WMNF's Kinsman Mountain - Gordon Pond and Kilkenny.

Society for the Protection of New Hampshire Forests (11/5/2013)

Forest Society requests that the DOE suspend the EIS because of Northern Pass's proposed illegal route.

(Town of) Stewartstown Selectboard  (11/5/2013)

" . . . deny the request for the entire application for the Presidential Permit."


Concerns include scenic areas and viewsheds; property values and loss of tax revenue; recreation land.

The Nature Conservancy (11/5/2013)

Environmental impacts. Northern Pass's proposed new right of way "will result in the fragmentation of three intact forest blocks . . . Unfragmented forest blocks are considered to be very important features on the natural landscape . . ."


Bury the entire line through Whitefield. 


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~