MIA: Local Support for Northern Pass
Both Governor Lynch and Governor Hassan have said that affected communities must support Northern Pass. Hydro-Quebec prides itself on favorable reception of its projects by host communities.
"This project cannot happen without local support." - Governor John Lynch (Jan 31, 2012), NHPR.
“Any proposal that they come forward with must be supported by the communities that are going to be affected. I think it is very important to take into consideration our scenic views and natural landscape because they are such valuable assets.” - Governor Maggie Hassan (Sep 5, 2012), NHPR.
"All of Hydro-Québec’s development projects must meet three criteria before they can proceed: they must be profitable, environmentally acceptable and favorably received by the host communities." Hydro-Quebec, a responsible company.
Opposition to Northern Pass by Affected Towns
- 33 towns have passed warrant articles or taken other official votes or actions, including "sense of the meeting" votes, against Northern Pass as proposed.
- At least 11 towns have intervened in the DOE Presidential Permit: Campton, Chichester, Clarksville, Colebrook, Columbia, Concord, Easton, Littleton, Plymouth, Sugar Hill, and Stewartstown.*
- 7 towns have written to Quebec Premier Charest and Hydro Quebec protesting Northern Pass:
Campton, Easton, Landaff, Stewartstown, Stratford, Sugar Hill, and Woodstock.
- At least 3 towns have established legal defense funds in opposition to Northern Pass: Easton, Sugar Hill, and Landaff.
- Several towns have passed rights-based ordinances (RBO's) in response to Northern Pass.
- Towns have requested consulting party status in the federal Section 106 historical review. (Town names have not been made public yet.)
*It is likely that additional towns have intervened. Towns that intervened by the initial deadline are listed separately. Towns that intervened after the deadline was extended must be hand culled from the nearly 8,000 scoping comments on the DOE's site for the Northern Pass EIS.