Saturday, October 19, 2019

Party In Bethlehem: Northern Pass Opponents Celebrate Project’s Defeat

Party In Bethlehem: Northern Pass Opponents Celebrate Project’s Defeat
Robert Blechl
Caledonian Record
           October 14, 2019

BETHLEHEM — It was a party they’d been waiting to throw for nearly a decade.
A good number of people, though, thought that day – celebrating the defeat of Northern Pass, an event that took place Sunday at The Rocks Estate and drew hundreds of people from across the North Country and New Hampshire – might never arrive.
“I was very dubious this day would come,” said Nancy Martland, of Sugar Hill, one of the many area residents in the fight against the unpopular hydroelectric transmission line proposal with 100-foot-high towers that would have cut through Coos and Grafton counties. “I wanted it so badly, but it just seemed like it was an uphill battle.
Russ Cumbee, of Easton, likened the battle to David and Goliath.
“It was so unusual,” he said. “When did the people win? We were up against so much money and political influence.”
David Van Houten, of Bethlehem, said he hoped a celebration day would come, but didn’t think it would.
“I’ve been through enough of these struggles,” he said, adding about Northern Pass – “Delighted, though.”
Others held out hope during the many years of uncertainty, when they educated themselves and others and attended all or some of the 70 public hearings before the New Hampshire Site Evaluation Committee, which in February 2018 denied Northern Pass’s application, a decision that was upheld in July by the New Hampshire Supreme Court.
“I always felt it had to come,” said Kris Pastoriza, of Easton, also in the fight from the outset.
So did former state Sen. Jeanie Forrester, R-Meredith, who fought against the project from the statehouse, where she supported legislation to stop it.
“I always thought we would prevail,” said Forrester. “I am so proud of all the people because it took everybody working together to get this done. I think this is a model for people to look at for other things in New Hampshire that are not right.”
Susan Schibanoff, now of Sugar Hill and formerly of Easton and who kept residents up to date on Northern Pass happenings through the Bury The Northern Pass blog, said she couldn’t see how opponents would fail, even though “we were up against enormous odds.”
“They had all the money,” she said. “We didn’t have any. Not that we needed it. It was our passion and dedication.”
That passion and dedication overcame a transmission line that went through two iterations, an all overhead line and a mixed line that would have been overhead in Coos and buried for 50 miles along roads beginning in Bethlehem and through Franconia and Sugar Hill south to Bridgewater.
Eversource Energy, the Northern Pass parent company partnering with Hydro-Quebec, stood to gain some $10 billion in revenue and a $4 billion guaranteed profit during the 40-year term of the line, according to its federal filings.
Those in the North Country, though, argued the project would be nothing more than an “extension cord” through the North Country to southern New England and the company’s benefit would come with many detriments up north, including a scarred landscape in a region known for its scenic beauty, hits to the tourism industry and property values, and disruptions to downtowns and businesses during the construction of the buried line.
The SEC agreed, and in a unanimous decision concluded Eversource did not meet its burden of proving Northern Pass would not unduly interfere with the orderly economic development of the region.
Although claiming for years that their project would not impact property values, Eversource, after the SEC decision, conceded it just might and then offered a $25 million pot for those to dip into to compensate for drops in values.
By that point, however, the application period was already over and the project was in its last gasps.
When the state Supreme Court hammered the final nail in the Northern Pass coffin, Eversource withdrew its project a week later.
Sunday’s celebration that drew about 300 people occurred under a fall day with full sun and foliage still on the trees, and just a step and a holler from where the towers would have passed by The Rocks Estate.
“The power of the people prevailed,” said Martland, among the several opponents speaking to the crowd. “Give yourselves a round of applause.”
Jack Savage, the new president of the Society for the Protection of New Hampshire Forests – an opponent of Northern Pass that, as Eversource bought up properties for its route in Coos, would then block the route through conservation easements entered into with other property owners – spoke of the legacy of Northern Pass.
“Other grassroots groups around the country look at what we’ve done and are fighting for something they might not have fought for before,” he said.
Schibanoff said there were three phases to the grassroots fight – “education, education and education,” with opponents educating themselves, then the state, and finally the SEC.
During that time, many area residents attended the 70 evidentiary hearings by SEC in Concord, saw testimony from 154 witnesses, and became familiar with more than 2,000 project exhibits stemming from the more than 20,000-page application by Eversource
Forrester said the fight was truly a bipartisan effort, and thanked the late Executive Councilor Ray Burton, among the first to speak out, former U.S. Sen. Kelly Ayotte, R-NH, and local elected officials that include state Rep. Sue Ford, D-Easton.
For Forrester’s role in the statehouse, it involved legislation, and the the first bill, sponsored by former state Rep. Larry Rappaport, R-Colebrook, prohibited private companies from using eminent domain to take private property for projects that, like Northern Pass, are elective.
What followed then were three Senate bills that showed the feasibility of burying transmission lines in state-owned transportation corridors and changing the rules and the membership of the SEC, to include some members from the public, said Forrester.
“It was nine years, but we did it,” she said.
 

Friday, July 6, 2018

Northern Pass Opposition Archive Opens in Sugar Hill, N.H.


Grassroots Victory Over Northern Pass To Be Archived For Future Generations

Wanted: Any Northern Pass Materials You Have

Robert Blechl
Caledonian Record
July 6, 2018








The Sugar Hill Historical Museum is now collecting Northern Pass materials that for a permanent archive to document the successful fight by grassroots citizens. Left to right: Sugar Hill resident Nancy Martland, Easton resident Susan Schibanoff, and Easton resident Kris Pastoriza (all members of the archive advisory committe), and museum director Kitty Bigelow. (Photo by Robert Blechl)



SUGAR HILL — Wanted: anything you have on Northern Pass
.


The Sugar Hill Historical Museum will now house a permanent archive of all things Northern Pass-related - hats, T-shirts, road signs, videos, documents, and more - to educate future generations about the seven-year grassroots fight, provide instruction on how to confront similar projects in the future if they ever arise, and memorialize a consequential part of North Country history.

The Northern Pass Opposition Archives is the brainchild of Easton resident Susan Schibanoff, who said in the course of opposing Northern Pass she tried to gather information on Easton’s 1970s battle against the ultimately defeated proposal for a four-lane highway through Franconia Notch, but found scant information.

“That grassroots effort to fight wasn’t preserved,” she said. “But we can preserve these materials so the person who does want to write this history will have access to the material.”

Currently at the Sugar Hill Historical museum are multiple versions of Northern Pass hats, T-shirts, and signs as well as lapel pins celebrating the documentary “The Power of Place” by Jerry Monkman and the Yankee Magazine article “My Roots Are Deeper Than Your Pockets.”

“We also have endless buttons and bumper stickers,” said Schibanoff. “We have posters and lawn signs and will also take documents.”

A request is now being made to residents of Grafton and Coos counties asking them to deliver what they have to the museum for posterity.

“This is a museum and everything is carefully recorded,” said Northern Pass opponent and Sugar Hill resident Nancy Martland. “Every piece people give will become part of a digitized record.”

The material, said Martland, will not be thrown willy-nilly into a box, but will be professionally archived.

While some people may not want to part with what they have, leaving it with the museum will ensure it’s preserved and not some day discarded by a relative after a death or a move, said Schibanoff.

The money for the Sugar Hill Historical Museum to archive is being provided through grants and an anonymous donor for the You Have Our Trust fund of the New Hampshire Charitable Foundation.

The town of Easton will also provide additional storage.

In addition to documenting the resistance of grassroots citizens, the archive will preserve the involvement of environmental, conservation, and non-governmental organizations, and make all the material available to researchers exploring the history of the opposition movement.

The museum in Sugar Hill might also, from time to time, put the archived materials into exhibits.

Other artifacts sought for collection are banners, bows, pins, post cards, CDs, and videos as well as magazine articles, newspaper clippings, and letters to the editor.

Photographs of events and photographs of items too large to store will also be preserved.

The museum will decline redundant materials.

Materials that can be submitted in person during the museum’s open hours of 11 a.m. to 3 p.m. Friday and Saturday until Columbus Day.

Items can also be sent via U.S. mail.

Those donating documents or other materials electronically are asked to not email large files to the museum, but to put what they have on flash or thumb drives.

Those donating are asked to include a statement with the name of the donor, a brief description of the artifact, and the date of its creation.

The archive advisory committee includes Martland, Schibanoff, and Easton resident Kris Pastoriza.

For more information, contact museum director Kitty Bigelow at kittyh41@gmail.com or Schibanoff at burynorthernpass@gmail.com.

In February, after more than two years under review, the seven-member N.H. Site Evaluation Committee unanimously denied the Northern Pass application submitted by Eversource Energy.

After 70 days of evidentiary hearings involving 154 witnesses and review of more than 2,000 exhibits, the SEC did not find that Eversource met its burden of proof in proving, by a preponderance of the evidence, that Northern Pass as proposed would not unduly interfere with the orderly economic development of the region.

The 192-mile line would have been almost all above-ground in Coos County, where towers would have been about 100 feet tall, with more than 50 miles of buried line along state roads through towns from Bethlehem to Bridgewater.

While it would have been a moneymaker for Eversource - $10 billion in revenue during the 40-year term of the line, including a $4 billion in guaranteed profit, according to the company’s federal filings - opponents argued Northern Pass would have destroyed scenic views and property values, would have hurt the tourism industry, and would have negatively impacted small businesses during the burial portion of construction in the roadways outside their front doors.

Scores of North Country residents testified during the SEC hearings and many more stayed mobilized for more than half a decade to defeat Northern Pass.

On May 24, the SEC denied a request by Eversource to resume the deliberations the committee ended Feb. 2.

Once the May denial is formalized in a written order, Eversource can appeal the SEC’s decision to the N.H. Supreme Court.

Opponents are confident the SEC decision is sound and will withstand any appeal by Eversource.

The other reason to get the word out now about the Northern Pass archive is because when people are in the thick of a fight they are not concerned with saving what they have, said Schibanoff, who four years into the Northern Pass fight had accumulated so much material she began culling it.

In addition to the Franconia Notch Parkway fight, Martland said a similar Northern Pass fight, one that involved a proposed above-ground transmission line slated for scenic areas of upstate New York that was also stopped by citizens, likewise wasn’t well-documented.

Martland doesn’t want the same fate to befall the battle of Northern Pass.

“Please help us grow this archive,” said Schibanoff.

The Sugar Hill Historical Museum, a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization, is located at 1401 Route 117, across from Harman's Cheese and the Sugar Hill Post Office. The mailing address is Sugar Hill Historical Museum, P.O. Box 591, Sugar Hill N.H. 03586. Museum open hours are 11:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m., Fridays and Saturdays, Memorial Day to Columbus Day. Contact Executive Director Kitty Bigelow at kittyh41@gmail.com or Susan Schibanoff at burynorthernpass@gmail.com for further information concerning the Archive project. 

Sunday, February 4, 2018

Northern Pass: Municipal Views

Northern Pass: Municipal Views

"This application for a Certificate of Site and Facility is unprecedented to the extent that it is a private merchant transmission line that is one of the most controversial and opposed energy projects in New Hampshire history. There has never been an approval of a high voltage transmission line energy project in which the vast majority of the host municipalities and unincorporated places have intervened and actively opposed a proposed project."  Northern Pass Docket 2015-06: Post Hearing Memorandum of Municipal Groups 1 South, 2, 3 South, and 3 North, January 12, 2018, p. 1.

For a 2011-2014 archive of Municipal Views, click here.




EASTON (2/3/2018)